![]() |
|
|
So the
question is: "Do we still need Journalists in the age of Social
Media?" Uhm...I don't really think so. Do we? Social Media has sort of
taken over from journalists. Why? well, because it's that platform that has
allowed anyone and everyone to be a reporter. When a story breaks out, the
time it takes a journalist to grab their camera man or note pad or voice
recorder and head to the scene, a video has already been uploaded on
Youtube, the story has been hash tagged, tweeted, retweeted, pictures all over
instagram and so forth. And the time it takes for an article to be written,
edited and printed, the news has already travelled all over the world. I can
imagine how frustrating it is. And smart phones? They're really not helping
either. They make access to social networks so much easier. BIS, data and the
worst of them all Wi-Fi!!! Imagine the whole world could all of a sudden do your job, overnight,
just like that. What would be the need for you?
![]() |
|
|
So it's nothing to panic about, and yes, we do still need journalists. I was just trying to think the way the rest of the world does. Their jobs are to do follow up stories and get more details about the story if someone else provided that information. And plus, they are still credible sources and we trust them more than ordinary citizens. They just have to know how to do things and follow the direction of the world. It's as simple as that! And that's exactly what they are doing.
Accountability as a source on Social Media






